|
J.J.
Abrams intrigued us last year with a teaser trailer that gave no name,
just an explosion in downtown Manhattan and the head of the Statue of
Liberty rolling down the street and a date, that was all. Genius if you
ask me, but the real question is, does it live up to all of the hype and
speculation that followed? I can attest that the answer is yes, it does.
Cloverfield is a
Godzilla type movie yet both less and more at the same time. Innovative
storytelling told through the lens of a video camera found in Central
Park by the Department of Defense with no narration, explanation or
anything. The whole story is told by the videotape recorded by a group
of friends in an eight hour period as they try to rescue another friend
and escape the city when a creature attacks New York,
On an intellectual level
Cloverfield should not work at all. What little character
development there is comes from gaps on the tape where what was
previously recorded comes through in between the current action, showing
bits and pieces of the two main characters past relationship. The ending
really shouldn't work either. It's abrupt and doesn't finish the story
of the situation, but it does give closure on our character's part in
the story. There is no explanation given to where the creature came
from, what it wants or where it's going. You never really even get a
great shot of what the thing looks like. And, to top it off,
Cloverfield had a budget of less than $30 to $50 million. For
comparison, Will Smith's
I Am Legend had a budget of
$150 million and for the record, I enjoyed Cloverfield much more
than I Am Legend.
The “acting” is phenomenal
when taken in context. No deep conversations or useless dialogue to
continue the story. Nope, this is just four young adults scared out of
their minds and doing the best that they can. Due to the lack of
character development you don't really care who they are, the raw
emotion of the situation is enough to make you care what happens to
these people who just happen to live in the wrong city at the wrong
time.
Only two small problems with
the film. One, the movie is shot entirely with a hand held camera and if
you are a regular reader of mine you know how much I hate the
“shaky-cam”. But, I can forgive it this time as the premise and style
make up for it although some people have complained of motion sickness
due to the movement. Two, I know Manhattan is a small island, but still,
the creature just happens to be everywhere our group is. I find that
just a tad unbelievable, but then again, it is a monster movie.
Except for those two minor
issues Cloverfield is one hell of an creative movie that delivers the
scares and tension in a whole new way.
I'm Mitch Emerson, and I
approve of this movie.
Rating = 9/10
Mitch E
mitchemerson@hotmail.com
|